Comments for C++ on a Friday http://blog.knatten.org C++ fun and intricacies, updated every Friday morning Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:38:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on How to avoid includes in headers by Sepehr http://blog.knatten.org/2012/11/30/how-to-avoid-includes-in-headers/#comment-719 Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:38:56 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=1418#comment-719 tanks very much

]]> Comment on Fighting FUD – Introducing C++11 to Legacy Programmers by meekrosoft http://blog.knatten.org/2013/04/12/fighting-fud-introducing-c11-to-legacy-programmers/#comment-712 Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:41:14 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=1479#comment-712 Like

]]> Comment on How to avoid includes in headers by test http://blog.knatten.org/2012/11/30/how-to-avoid-includes-in-headers/#comment-683 Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:59:28 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=1418#comment-683 I truly appreciate this post. I have been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thank you again!

]]> Comment on New Job, and Windows Survival 101 by Åsmund Skjæveland http://blog.knatten.org/2010/08/06/new-job-and-windows-survival-101/#comment-681 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:55:51 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=417#comment-681 I think Console2 is a pretty neat replacement for the standard Windows terminal. It runs the same shell, but with more sensible window resizing, better copy-paste, and tabbed windows.

]]> Comment on How to avoid includes in headers by Anonymous http://blog.knatten.org/2012/11/30/how-to-avoid-includes-in-headers/#comment-573 Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:13:26 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=1418#comment-573 function return types can also be foward declared.

]]> Comment on How to avoid includes in headers by jfheidt http://blog.knatten.org/2012/11/30/how-to-avoid-includes-in-headers/#comment-564 Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:54:09 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=1418#comment-564 Im pretty sure it wouldn’t compile, instead it would slap you and ask you where it’s money is.

]]> Comment on How to avoid includes in headers by Anders Schau Knatten http://blog.knatten.org/2012/11/30/how-to-avoid-includes-in-headers/#comment-545 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:39:52 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=1418#comment-545 Haha, thanks, fixed it. I wonder what the pimp idiom would look like though. Pimp my code? Excessive template meta programming? Pattern completeness?

]]> Comment on How to avoid includes in headers by Bart Vandewoestyne http://blog.knatten.org/2012/11/30/how-to-avoid-includes-in-headers/#comment-543 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:30:42 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=1418#comment-543 Interesting read related to this is item 34 ‘Minimize compilation dependencies between files’ in Effective C++ (2nd Edition).

]]> Comment on How to avoid includes in headers by jake http://blog.knatten.org/2012/11/30/how-to-avoid-includes-in-headers/#comment-541 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:48:43 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=1418#comment-541 Pimpl idiom. Not Pimp idiom. For (P)rivate (Impl)ementation.

]]> Comment on What I Have Against Precompiled Headers by How to avoid includes in headers « C++ on a Friday http://blog.knatten.org/2010/10/29/what-i-have-against-precompiled-headers/#comment-540 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:00:54 +0000 http://blog.knatten.org/?p=660#comment-540 [...] final technique that cannot go unmentioned is precompiled headers. While I don’t like what they do to dependencies, I consider them a necessary evil in medium to large projects to keep compile-times reasonable. [...]

]]>